Read the original article here.

---

Framing in the Digital Age: Shaping Perception and Behavior with Data

Framing, a fundamental concept in the social sciences, helps us understand how reality is organized, perceived, and communicated. In today's hyper-connected digital world, understanding framing is crucial because it is a primary mechanism used in digital manipulation, influencing how we interpret information, make decisions, and even form our identity based on the data collected about us.

Framing is not just about individual thought; it's also a dynamic process of communication between individuals, groups, and large-scale actors like media organizations, political campaigns, and corporations. These actors use data to refine and target frames, making them incredibly powerful tools for shaping mass perception and behavior in the digital realm.

What is Framing?

At its core, framing involves selecting certain aspects of a perceived reality and making them more prominent in a communication context. This emphasis encourages particular interpretations, evaluations, and responses to an issue, while downplaying or ignoring others.

Definition: Framing In social sciences, framing is a set of concepts and theoretical perspectives on how individuals, groups, and societies organize, perceive, and communicate about reality. It manifests in thought (mental representations, interpretations, simplifications) and communication (the transfer of frames between actors). Effectively, frames act as mental filters or interpretive schemas that individuals use to make sense of the world around them.

Frames are not simply about bias, although personal biases and experiences (shaped by culture and biology) contribute to the frames individuals already possess. Framing is a broader process of contextualizing information to make abstract or complex topics understandable by linking them to existing knowledge or perspectives.

Digital Context: In digital manipulation, data profiling allows manipulators to understand the existing frames (biases, schemas, knowledge) of target individuals or groups. This knowledge is then used to craft messages that exploit or align with these pre-existing filters, making the framed message feel more natural, relevant, and persuasive.

How Frames Work: Mental Filters and Social Construction

Individuals rely on mental frameworks—schemas—to quickly process the overwhelming amount of information they encounter daily. These schemas are built through biological influences (our inherent cognitive wiring) and cultural influences (upbringing, social groups, media exposure). When we encounter new information, we don't build an understanding from scratch; we fit it into our existing mental frames.

Definition: Schema (or Schema of Interpretation) In social theory, a schema of interpretation is a collection of anecdotes and stereotypes, or a mental structure, that individuals rely on to understand and respond to events. Think of it as a blueprint or shortcut our brains use to process information based on past experiences and knowledge.

Framing is often a process of social construction, meaning that shared understandings and interpretations of phenomena are built through communication and interaction, significantly influenced by powerful actors like mass media, political leaders, social movements, and increasingly, digital platforms and algorithmic systems. Participation in online communities, for instance, profoundly shapes an individual's perception of the meanings attached to words, symbols, and events.

Digital Context: Online platforms facilitate the social construction of reality on a massive scale. Viral content, trending hashtags, shared memes, and group discussions (especially in curated online communities) quickly propagate frames. Algorithms amplify content that resonates, effectively strengthening specific frames within user feeds and contributing to the formation of digital "language communities" or echo chambers where certain interpretations become dominant. Data about user engagement (likes, shares, comments) provides instant feedback, allowing manipulators to quickly identify which frames are most effective and double down on them.

Framing vs. Agenda Setting: A Key Distinction

While often discussed together, framing and agenda setting are distinct concepts in communication research.

Definition: Agenda Setting Agenda setting refers to the media's ability to influence the importance placed on topics of public agenda. By repeatedly featuring certain issues prominently, media sources can make those issues seem more important and accessible in the public's mind. It tells you what to think about.

Definition: Framing (Distinguished from Agenda Setting) Framing, in contrast, focuses on how an issue is presented. It selects specific aspects of an issue and makes them more prominent to elicit certain interpretations and evaluations. Framing tells you how to think about something.

Digital Context: Digital manipulators often use both techniques in tandem. They might use algorithmic amplification and trending topics to put an issue (like a specific political scandal or social debate) on the public agenda (Agenda Setting). Then, they use targeted messaging, selective information presentation, and emotional language to frame that issue in a specific light for different user segments based on their data profiles (Framing). Data-driven tools allow for unprecedented precision in simultaneously setting agendas and framing discussions across diverse populations.

Mechanisms of Framing

Framing operates through various mechanisms, primarily influencing how information is processed and the weight given to different considerations.

Types of Frames: Equivalency and Emphasis

Framing research often identifies two primary types:

1. Equivalency Frames: These present two or more logically equivalent alternatives in different ways, leading to different preferences or decisions. The classic example involves presenting outcomes in terms of "gains" versus "losses."

   Definition: Equivalency Frames Framing techniques where two or more options or outcomes that are objectively the same are described or presented in different ways, leading individuals to perceive them differently and potentially make different choices.

   Example (The Asian Disease Problem): Participants are asked to choose between two programs to combat a disease expected to kill 600 people.

   • Gain Frame: Program A: "200 people will be saved" (chosen by 72%). Program B: "1/3 probability 600 saved, 2/3 probability none saved" (chosen by 28%). People prefer the sure gain.
   • Loss Frame: Program C: "400 people will die" (chosen by 22%). Program D: "1/3 probability nobody dies, 2/3 probability 600 die" (chosen by 78%). People prefer the gamble to avoid a sure loss. Programs A and C are identical (600 total - 200 saved = 400 die). Programs B and D are identical. The framing as gains or losses significantly altered preferences. This phenomenon is central to Prospect Theory.

     Definition: Prospect Theory A behavioral economic theory developed by Kahneman and Tversky that describes how individuals make decisions under uncertainty and risk. It highlights that people value gains and losses differently and are more sensitive to potential losses than equivalent potential gains, explaining preference reversals seen in equivalency framing.

   Digital Context: This is frequently used in online advertising, e-commerce, and policy communication. "Save 10%!" (Gain frame, encouraging purchase) vs. "Don't lose out on 10% savings!" (Loss frame, encouraging urgency). Political messages might frame policy changes as protecting existing benefits ("Prevent loss of healthcare!") or offering new opportunities ("Gain access to better jobs!"). Online platforms can test different gain/loss framings using A/B testing on user segments to see which is most effective for driving clicks or conversions.

2. Emphasis Frames: These simplify reality by focusing on a subset of relevant aspects of a situation or issue, making those aspects more salient while others are de-emphasized or ignored.

   Definition: Emphasis Frames Framing techniques that highlight certain aspects, facts, or considerations of an issue, making them more prominent and relevant for interpretation and judgment, while downplaying or omitting other aspects.

   Example (Ku Klux Klan Rally): A news story about a planned KKK rally could be framed in different ways:

   • Public Safety Frame: Emphasizes potential violence, police resources required, disruption. This framing encourages lower tolerance for the rally.
   • Free Speech Frame: Emphasizes constitutional rights, freedom of expression, importance of protecting unpopular views. This framing encourages greater tolerance for the rally. The underlying event (the planned rally) is the same, but the aspect emphasized changes how people think about it and their resulting opinion.

   Digital Context: Digital content creators, media outlets, political groups, and algorithms constantly use emphasis framing. A news feed algorithm might show you only headlines and snippets emphasizing the economic aspects of a policy if your data suggests you are interested in finance, while showing another user content emphasizing the social justice aspects if their data suggests that interest. Political campaigns use microtargeting to send different emphasis frames about the same candidate or issue to different voter groups based on their online behavior, demographics, and inferred beliefs.

Psychological Processes: Applicability and Accessibility

How do frames influence our judgment? Early theories focused on accessibility, suggesting frames make certain information more easily retrievable from memory. More recent research emphasizes applicability, arguing that frames work by making certain considerations seem more relevant or appropriate for forming a judgment.

Definition: Accessibility (in Framing) The degree to which certain pieces of information or mental constructs are easily retrieved from long-term memory when making judgments. Frames were thought to increase accessibility by making certain information prominent.

Definition: Applicability (in Framing) The perceived relevance or appropriateness of certain considerations, values, or facts for making a judgment about a particular issue. More recent research suggests frames primarily work by increasing the applicability of certain information.

Example: Seeing a news story about poverty.

• Accessibility Theory: If the story mentions unemployment statistics (even briefly), those numbers become more accessible in your memory, potentially influencing your judgment about poverty's causes.
• Applicability Theory: If the story frames poverty as a result of individual choices (Episodic Frame), it makes the concept of individual responsibility seem more applicable to understanding poverty than systemic issues. If it frames poverty in terms of economic policies or lack of social safety nets (Thematic Frame), it makes societal factors seem more applicable.

Digital Context: Data allows manipulators to target users based on their existing schemas and perceived values, increasing the applicability of a given frame. An algorithm might identify that a user frequently engages with content about individual responsibility. It will then preferentially show them framed content about poverty, crime, or health issues that emphasizes individual blame or choice, making that frame feel more applicable and resonant with their existing beliefs.

Cognitive Load: Cognitive Misers and Schemas

Humans are often described as "cognitive misers." This means we tend to prefer mental shortcuts and minimize the effort required to process information.

Definition: Cognitive Misers A psychological concept suggesting that people tend to default to less effortful thinking processes, relying on mental shortcuts (heuristics) and existing schemas to make judgments and decisions rather than engaging in deep, systematic processing of information.

Frames are effective because they provide pre-packaged interpretations that fit neatly into existing schemas, reducing the cognitive load required to understand complex issues.

Digital Context: Digital platforms, designed for rapid consumption (scrolling feeds, short videos), exacerbate this tendency. Content optimized for quick understanding and emotional reaction thrives. Manipulative framing leverages this by delivering simple, emotionally charged messages that align with user schemas identified through data. Complex nuances are stripped away, replaced by easily digestible, framed narratives that require minimal critical thinking. Algorithmic feeds curate information specifically to match a user's presumed cognitive preferences, reinforcing the effectiveness of tailored frames.

Framing in the Digital Landscape: Examples and Applications

Framing is pervasive in the digital world, influencing everything from the news we see to the products we buy and the political opinions we form. Data collection and algorithmic targeting have made digital framing incredibly powerful and often invisible.

Media Framing (Online News & Social Media)

News organizations and increasingly, individual content creators and social media algorithms, frame events. They choose which stories to cover, which aspects to highlight, which words and images to use, and who to quote.

• Frame Building: How are these frames created online? They are shaped by factors like platform constraints (character limits on Twitter, visual focus on Instagram), professional routines (chasing clicks, optimizing for engagement metrics), the need for cultural resonance (tapping into existing online trends or community values), and pressure from political or commercial interests who use data to push their narratives.
• Frame Setting: How do online frames influence audiences? Exposure to a dominant frame online can make those specific aspects of an issue more prominent in users' minds and more applicable to their judgments. Data about what content users click, share, and react to allows platforms and content creators to refine frames for maximum impact and virality.

Examples in Digital Media:

• Selecting Headlines/Thumbnails: Using emotionally charged words or dramatic images in clickable headlines and thumbnails to frame a story even before the content is read. Data on click-through rates informs which framing works best.
• Social Media Narratives: How events are framed using hashtags (#BlackLivesMatter, #AllLivesMatter, #BlueLivesMatter frame discussions about race and policing differently), memes (often used to quickly convey and reinforce framed interpretations with humor or satire), and viral videos (often presented without original context, framed by the caption or platform it's shared on).
• Algorithmically Curated Feeds: Your social media feed isn't a neutral reflection of reality. Algorithms frame the world for you by selecting which stories, posts, and perspectives you see based on your past data, reinforcing certain frames and hiding others.

Visual Framing

In the visual-heavy digital space, images, videos, and graphics are potent framing tools.

Definition: Visual Framing The process of using images, videos, graphics, and other visual elements to portray certain parts of reality, emphasize specific aspects of an issue, or evoke particular emotional responses, often in conjunction with textual framing.

Images are processed quickly, have strong emotional appeal, and can feel highly credible ("seeing is believing"). However, visuals can easily obscure issues or facts through selective depiction, manipulation (e.g., Photoshop, deepfakes), or presentation without context.

Digital Context:

• Manipulated Images/Videos: Digitally altered images or deepfake videos are extreme examples of visual framing used for disinformation and manipulation, designed to create a false reality or elicit specific strong emotional reactions.
• Selective Imagery: News outlets or political campaigns might consistently use specific types of images to frame groups (e.g., showing only chaotic images of protests to frame them negatively, or only sympathetic images of refugees to frame them positively). This is often informed by testing which images resonate most effectively with target audiences identified via data.
• Infographics and Data Visualizations: Even ostensibly neutral data visualizations can be framed through design choices, scales, colors, and what data is included or excluded, shaping perceptions of complex issues like climate change or economic inequality.

Political Framing

Political communication heavily relies on framing to persuade voters, define issues, and attack opponents. The digital age has amplified this.

• Strategic Language: Politicians and their strategists meticulously choose words and phrases (like "tax relief" vs. "tax burden," or "explore for energy" vs. "drilling") to trigger specific associations and fit issues into broader narratives that favor their position. Data from polls, focus groups, and online behavior analysis informs which language and frames resonate most with different voter segments.
• Defining Problems and Solutions: Framing an issue involves defining what the problem is, who is responsible, what the moral implications are, and what the recommended solution is.
  • Example (9/11): Initially framed by some as a "crime," quickly re-framed by the Bush administration as an act of "war," leading to the "War on Terror." This framing dramatically shifted the perceived problem (criminal justice vs. military conflict) and the appropriate response (law enforcement vs. military action).
• Agenda Setting via Framing: Consistently using a particular frame online can shape public discourse and limit how an issue is debated, pushing alternative framings out of the conversation.
• Microtargeting: Using vast amounts of data on individual voters' demographics, interests, online activity, and consumer habits to deliver highly specific political messages framed to resonate with their particular values and concerns. This allows campaigns to tailor messages to individual profiles in ways previously impossible.

Digital Political Framing Examples:

• Targeting "Tax Relief" Frame: Data identifies users who are highly sensitive to taxes. They receive online ads, emails, or social media content focusing heavily on the "tax relief" frame, emphasizing how a policy will reduce their personal burden.
• Targeting "Infrastructure" Frame: Data identifies users who value public services or community investment. They receive messages about the same policy, but framed around how it funds vital infrastructure and benefits society, rather than focusing on personal tax cuts.
• Framing Welfare: Online discussions and campaigns might frame welfare as a government "duty" or "political credit" for citizens, or conversely, use terms like "handouts" or emphasize individual "hard work" to frame it as a zero-sum game where taxpayers lose. Data helps identify which framing is likely to be effective with different demographics.
• Dehumanization: As seen in conflicts, online propaganda often frames opposing groups using dehumanizing language or imagery, making them appear less than human or fundamentally alien. This framing reduces empathy and justifies harsh treatment, exploiting cognitive biases.

Behavioral Economics and Consumer Framing

Framing significantly impacts decision-making, particularly concerning risk and value perception, which is heavily utilized in online commerce and marketing.

Digital Context:

• Product Descriptions: Framing a product's effectiveness in relative terms ("75% fat-free!") often sounds more appealing than in absolute terms ("Contains 25% fat!"), even though the information is identical. Online retailers use A/B testing to determine which framing drives more sales.
• Pricing Strategies: Presenting prices in different ways ("Only $10 a month!" vs. "Costs $120 a year!"). Framing discounts as losses to be avoided ("Limited time offer: Don't miss out on 20% off!") leverages loss aversion.
• Online Nudges and Dark Patterns: Website interfaces can use framing ("Most popular option," "Recommended") and design elements (default selections, pre-checked boxes framed as convenient) to nudge users towards certain choices by making those options appear more favorable or less risky.

The Power and Effectiveness of Digital Framing

The effectiveness of framing, particularly in the digital age, stems from several interconnected factors:

1. Exploiting Cognitive Biases: As cognitive misers, we are susceptible to frames that simplify complex information. Digital platforms deliver vast amounts of information rapidly, encouraging quick processing rather than deep analysis, making us more reliant on pre-packaged frames.
2. Increased Applicability via Data: Data allows manipulators to understand individual users' existing values, beliefs, and schemas with unprecedented detail. This enables them to select or construct frames that are highly applicable and resonant for that specific user, increasing the likelihood of the frame being accepted and influencing judgment.
3. Judged Usability: Online platforms and algorithms influence which information seems most "usable" for making judgments. By elevating certain framed content (e.g., through prominence in a feed, trending lists, or algorithmic recommendations) and suppressing others, digital systems make the chosen frames appear more relevant and reliable.
4. Amplification and Echo Chambers: Algorithms are often designed to maximize engagement, meaning content that elicits strong emotional responses or confirms existing beliefs is amplified. Framed content is often highly effective at this. This creates echo chambers where users are primarily exposed to information that reinforces their existing frames, making those frames more rigid and resistant to alternative perspectives.
5. Speed and Reach: Digital framing can spread globally in moments, reaching billions. This speed and reach allow frames to become dominant rapidly and make counter-framing efforts more difficult.

In essence, data enables manipulators to:

• Understand You: Build detailed profiles of your beliefs, values, and sensitivities.
• Tailor Frames: Craft messages framed specifically to resonate with your profile.
• Target You: Deliver these tailored messages directly to you through digital channels.
• Amplify Frames: Use algorithms and online networks to make their preferred frames dominant and widely visible, while potentially suppressing counter-frames.
• Exploit Your Cognition: Leverage your tendency towards quick processing by providing readily available, framed interpretations.

Framing, Data, and Control

The connection between framing, data, and control lies in the ability to systematically influence how large populations perceive reality and make decisions without necessarily presenting overtly false information. By controlling the frame, manipulators can control the interpretation and the resulting action.

• Shaping Public Opinion: Data-driven framing is used to manipulate public sentiment on political issues, social debates, and corporate reputations.
• Influencing Consumer Behavior: Framing around price, value, urgency, or social norms (e.g., "everyone is buying this") drives online purchases and consumption patterns.
• Political Persuasion: Microtargeted political framing can sway elections by emphasizing different aspects of a candidate or policy to different voter segments, making specific choices appear most rational or appealing to each group based on their data.
• Social Engineering: Framing is used in phishing attacks, scams, and online radicalization to manipulate individuals into taking specific actions (clicking a link, providing information, adopting extremist views) by framing requests or ideologies in ways that exploit psychological vulnerabilities or align with perceived group identities.

The pervasive nature of data collection online provides the raw material. Algorithms provide the machinery to process this data and deliver framed content with precision and scale. This creates an environment where individual perception and collective behavior can be subtly, but profoundly, steered by those who control the data and the framing.

Conclusion

Framing is a powerful tool for organizing, perceiving, and communicating reality. In the digital age, fueled by vast amounts of data and sophisticated algorithms, framing has become a central mechanism for shaping how individuals and societies understand the world. By leveraging data to understand users' existing schemas and targeting them with highly resonant and applicable frames, manipulators can influence opinions, behaviors, and decisions on an unprecedented scale. Recognizing framing – understanding that the way information is presented is as important as the information itself – is the first step in navigating the digitally manipulated landscape and asserting agency over our own interpretations and choices.